Scientific guidance and assessment. Evaluation criteria associated with program work

Scientific guidance and assessment. Evaluation criteria associated with program work

The systematic supervisor associated with the program tasks are appointed because of the Department of Sociology, concentrating on the product range of systematic passions of instructors and the quantity of scholastic training load.

The primary tasks regarding the manager

The primary task associated with the manager – advising and monitoring the entire process of utilization of pupil coursework.

The obligations regarding the manager include:

– help in selecting the subject for the program work plus the development Of a ongoing work plan;

– conducting systematic consultations with the student on problems of work;

– support into the selection of research practices;

– advising the pupil from the collection of types of literature and factual product;

– monitoring the progress of work with conformity using the founded plan and certification that is intermediate of pupil;

– work evaluation.

Evaluation criteria associated with the program work

The primary criteria for the evaluation of coursework consist of:

– the correctness of this reported function and goals associated with the work and The content to their compliance of this work;

– liberty of this writer’s way of the disclosure associated with the topic, like the formula and reason of their approach that is own to research dilemmas;

– persistence and structured presentation for the product, such as thequality associated with the introduction and summary, the connection and continuity Between the right elements of the task, between your theoretical and practical facets of the analysis;

– the quality of the analysis additionally the capacity to utilize the types of systematic research, like the quality of analysis obtainable in the literature methods to the research regarding the dilemmas into consideration;

– The practical importance of the program work, such as the connection of theoretical positions considered in the ongoing work, with repetition;

– the correctness regarding the utilization of sources, including conformity with all the guidelines for compiling a summary of sources;

– compliance with all the coursework design needs, precision of design, the lack of spelling and errors that are grammatical the written text (especially whenever utilizing unique terminology);

– the contribution that is personal of writer towards the analysis and research of this issue.

Conformity aided by the guidelines of research ethics

While preparing a program work, unique attention is paid to pupils‘ conformity aided by the rules of research ethics. In no full instance should plagiarism, falsification of information and „false quoting“ be applied.

Once we mention plagiarism, we suggest direct borrowing without appropriate sources to your printed or electronic sources, previously defended last qualifying works, master’s and dissertations that are doctoral.

We mean to a fake or change the when we say the falsification of data supply information so that you can show the correctness regarding the conclusion (confirmation associated with the hypothesis, etc.), plus the deliberate usage of false information being a foundation for analysis.

False quote means the presence of links into the supply once the provided supply will not include such information or suggests a page that is invalid.

Detection of ethical breaches results in bad evaluation.

The breakthrough among these violations of expert ethics could be the foundation for reducing markings for course work, as much as grading „unsatisfactory“.

Course work is rated on a scale that is five-point. The supervisor evaluates the work taking into consideration the quality regarding the text (for example. its content, logic and argumentation), the theoretical and methodological amount of work, additionally the completeness regarding the source database. Along with the knowledge and use of the literature customwritings net on the subject, the correctness for the formula and solution of the extensive research issue, the credibility and legitimacy of this conclusions work, the design that is correct of work, plus the quality of message during the protection and also the capacity to lead a clinical conversation.